irac-practice

Grade IRAC essays for structure, issue-spotting, rule accuracy, analysis depth, and organization.

100|16|Updated May 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill irac-practice-zekaisuni
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: irac-practice
Source: https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/tree/main/law-student/skills/irac-practice
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill irac-practice-zekaisuni

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

IRAC practice often fails because students get feedback that is either too vague or too substantive (rewriting a “model”), so they can’t reliably learn how to spot issues, state rules, and apply them with the right structure.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • IRAC-structure grading: Grades whether the essay follows IRAC/CRAC structure, including issue-spotting coverage, rule statement quality, application mapping, and organization.
  • Rule accuracy checks with uncertainty controls: Flags rule statements that need verification and separates confident structure feedback from less certain doctrinal evaluation.
  • Pattern tracking across sessions: Appends results to a per-student tracker to surface recurring gaps after multiple practice rounds.
  • Guardrails for real-world fact patterns: Detects when the prompt looks like a real situation and steers users toward learning/general concepts rather than advice.

Quick Start

Paste your IRAC essay (or the hypo plus your draft) and ask the skill to grade it for structure, issue-spotting, rule accuracy, analysis depth, and organization.

Frequently Asked Questions about irac-practice

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I grade my IRAC essay without getting a rewritten model answer?

To grade an IRAC essay without rewriting, paste your draft and request structural feedback. The skill evaluates issue-spotting, rule accuracy, analysis depth, and organization, providing targeted feedback instead of a model answer.

Can I get feedback on my issue spotting and rule application for a law school hypothetical?

Yes, you can get feedback on issue spotting and rule application for law school hypotheticals. Paste the hypo with your draft, and the skill assesses structural coverage, rule statement quality, and application mapping.

What is the best way to track recurring structural mistakes in my legal writing practice?

The best way to track recurring structural mistakes is using a session tracker. The skill appends grading results to a per-student tracker, surfacing recurring gaps in your legal writing after multiple practice rounds.

Does IRAC grading check rule accuracy and flag doctrinal statements that need verification?

Yes, IRAC grading checks rule accuracy and flags doctrinal statements needing verification. It separates confident structural feedback from less certain doctrinal evaluation using uncertainty controls.

What happens if I submit a real-world legal fact pattern instead of a practice hypothetical?

If you submit a real-world legal fact pattern, the skill detects it and steers you toward learning general concepts rather than providing legal advice, maintaining guardrails for educational practice.