What problem does it solve?
IRAC practice often fails because students get feedback that is either too vague or too substantive (rewriting a “model”), so they can’t reliably learn how to spot issues, state rules, and apply them with the right structure.
Core Features & Use Cases
- IRAC-structure grading: Grades whether the essay follows IRAC/CRAC structure, including issue-spotting coverage, rule statement quality, application mapping, and organization.
- Rule accuracy checks with uncertainty controls: Flags rule statements that need verification and separates confident structure feedback from less certain doctrinal evaluation.
- Pattern tracking across sessions: Appends results to a per-student tracker to surface recurring gaps after multiple practice rounds.
- Guardrails for real-world fact patterns: Detects when the prompt looks like a real situation and steers users toward learning/general concepts rather than advice.
Quick Start
Paste your IRAC essay (or the hypo plus your draft) and ask the skill to grade it for structure, issue-spotting, rule accuracy, analysis depth, and organization.