issue-dispatcher

Classify GitHub issues into GENESIS, MULTI-COMPONENT, or SINGLE-COMPONENT routes.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/magnum6actual/dev-sop --skill issue-dispatcher-magnum6actual
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: issue-dispatcher
Source: https://github.com/magnum6actual/dev-sop/tree/main/common/skills/issue-dispatcher
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/magnum6actual/dev-sop --skill issue-dispatcher-magnum6actual

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Triage and route GitHub issues to the correct development flow, reducing manual decision-making and speeding up project initiation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Issue triage: automatically classify into GENESIS, MULTI-COMPONENT, or SINGLE-COMPONENT.
  • Route to appropriate downstream skill: genesis lifecycle pushback, feature-roadmap discovery, or component-start prompts.
  • Context preservation: pass issue URL, labels, and discussion context to downstream agents for consistent handoffs.
  • Ambiguity handling: flag ambiguous issues and request clarifications before routing.

Quick Start

Provide a GitHub issue URL or reference and let this skill determine the correct routing path.

Frequently Asked Questions about issue-dispatcher

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate GitHub issue triage and routing to the correct development workflow?

GitHub issue triage is automated by reading issue bodies, labels, and context to classify work into specific categories. It then routes issues to the correct development flow, reducing manual decision-making and speeding up project initiation.

How does automated issue classification decide between starting a new project or a single-feature workflow?

Automated issue classification reads issue content and context to categorize work as GENESIS, MULTI-COMPONENT, or SINGLE-COMPONENT. It uses these classifications to initiate a feature-roadmap, push back, or start a component flow accordingly.

What is the best way to handle ambiguous GitHub issues during the triage process?

The best way to handle ambiguous GitHub issues during triage is to flag them and request clarifications before routing. This ensures the issue has sufficient context to determine the correct downstream development path.

Can I use GitHub issue labels and acceptance criteria to route issues to downstream agents?

Yes, you can use GitHub issue labels and acceptance criteria to route issues. The process preserves issue URLs, labels, and discussion context, passing them to downstream agents for consistent handoffs and workflow initiation.

When do I need to initiate a feature-roadmap instead of a single-component coding flow for a GitHub issue?

You need to initiate a feature-roadmap when an issue spans major refactors or multiple components. Conversely, a single-component flow is triggered for isolated single-feature work based on the issue's classified scope.

Do I need to manually prepare starting context before routing GitHub issues to downstream skills?

No, you do not need to manually prepare starting context. The routing process uses issue content and context to surface a recommended route and automatically prepare starting context for downstream skills.