issue-review-reply

Translate GitHub issues into maintainer interpretations and draft replies.

1.2k|95|Updated Aug 23, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/aizhimou/pigeon-pod --skill issue-review-reply
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: issue-review-reply
Source: https://github.com/aizhimou/pigeon-pod/tree/main/.agent/skills/issue-review-reply
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aizhimou/pigeon-pod --skill issue-review-reply

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Review and interpret GitHub issues accurately, draft maintainer replies, and plan safe, approved GitHub actions, separating analysis from execution.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Explain what an issue really means to clarify intent and scope.
  • Draft maintainer replies and recommend follow-up actions, including adding items to the GitHub Project or creating tracked tasks.
  • Enforce explicit approval before performing any GitHub writes and ensure analysis and execution are separated.

Quick Start

Provide a concise maintainer-ready issue interpretation, draft reply, and an approved task plan for execution.

Frequently Asked Questions about issue-review-reply

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I draft maintainer replies for GitHub issues?

To draft maintainer replies for GitHub issues, this Skill translates issue reports into precise maintainer-facing interpretations, determines codebase feasibility, and generates recommended follow-up actions with explicit approval gates.

How does issue review automation separate analysis from execution?

Issue review automation separates analysis from execution by enforcing explicit approval gates before performing any GitHub writes, ensuring maintainers review proposed project updates and task tracking before actions are executed.

Can I track GitHub issues and add items to a GitHub Project automatically?

Yes, you can track GitHub issues by proposing to add items to a GitHub Project or create tracked tasks, but the automation requires explicit maintainer approval before performing these GitHub actions.

What is the best way to clarify the intent and scope of a GitHub issue?

The best way to clarify the intent and scope of a GitHub issue is to translate the user report into a concise maintainer-ready interpretation, determining feasibility against the current codebase and referencing relevant repo context.

Do I need to approve GitHub actions before this issue tracking workflow executes them?

Yes, you need to approve GitHub actions explicitly, as this workflow enforces a strict separation of analysis and execution to ensure safe, approved project updates before any writes occur.

GitHub issue review not capturing the actual codebase feasibility?

If GitHub issue review is not capturing codebase feasibility, this Skill references relevant repo context to determine feasibility accurately, ensuring the maintainer reply and proposed task plan match current project constraints.