issue-review-two-phases-1

An end-to-end issue review validates architecture decisions, planning, and pre-implementation tasks for GitHub issues. You need it before coding to standardize design discussions and reduce rework by aligning expectations upfront.

You plan GitHub issue implementations by running a structured design interview, deriving a ToDo list, and outlining a refactor guide. This validates architecture decisions and generates a step-by-step coding process without creating commits.

Yes, you can generate a refactor guide aligned with clean-code and TDD principles during issue planning. It outlines a step-by-step coding process to validate implementation decisions before any actual code is written or committed.

Yes, the issue review workflow applies to GitHub issues across diverse projects. It standardizes architecture decisions and pre-implementation validation, helping teams design and validate changes regardless of the specific project architecture.

The best way to structure a design interview for architecture decisions is using targeted prompts that drill into dependencies and trade-offs. This standardized approach produces an approved task list and a non-committing implementation guide.

Validating pre-implementation planning before writing code reduces rework and misaligned expectations. It ensures architecture decisions and ToDo lists are agreed upon upfront, streamlining the actual coding and refactor process.