issue-workflow

To plan and execute GitHub issues, this workflow mandates requirements extraction, build-vs-buy evaluation, and codebase exploration. It enforces structured analysis, design, and testing strategy steps to ensure robust issue resolution and high-quality pull requests.

The best way to structure an issue lifecycle is applying a repeatable process across planning, execution, and review phases. This approach integrates adversarial review and testing strategy planning to ensure robust pull requests and high-quality deliverables.

Yes, effective issue planning requires build-vs-buy evaluation and codebase exploration to prevent errors. Mandating these research steps ensures design considerations and integration planning are addressed before executing the implementation phase.

Yes, you can apply a testing strategy during the GitHub issue review phase. The workflow advises adversarial review and integration planning during this stage to guarantee robust pull requests and validate the overall implementation quality.

Your GitHub issue workflow lacks design and integration planning because it does not mandate these steps. Implementing a structured issue lifecycle enforces analysis, design, testing strategy, and integration planning to prevent error-prone executions.