iterate

This workflow organizes findings for sequential processing by creating individual tasks with in-progress tracking and gated approvals. You can review each item one by one and explicitly approve or decline it before implementation, ensuring clear ownership and traceable progress throughout the audit.

The best approach is per-item task creation with explicit in-progress, completed, and declined states. This enforces gated approvals before implementing changes, allowing you to plan first when needed and maintain clear ownership over incremental improvements throughout the backlog.

Yes, argument-driven filtering lets you focus on specific items for per-item review. You can pass arguments like "1,3,5" to select certain indices or "only security-related" to narrow the scope of findings requiring sequential processing and gated approval.

Per-item approval gating enforces an explicit review step before implementing changes for each assessment finding. The workflow initializes for the first finding, requests approval, and only proceeds to execution after approval is granted, with an option to plan first when needed.

Yes, the workflow supports a plan-or-implement option. When processing findings, assessments, or improvement backlogs, you can choose to plan first before executing changes, providing flexibility in how you approach each item requiring gated approval.