Verified:GitHub

iterate

Revise implementation plans by applying review feedback with consistency rules.

Updated Aug 27, 2026

Search Tags:#consistency #software-engineering #agent-coordination #review-feedback #iterate #planning-workflow #plan-revision

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/ncy08/clear-claude-code --skill iterate-ncy08

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: iterate
Source: https://github.com/ncy08/clear-claude-code/tree/main/tools/skills/iterate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ncy08/clear-claude-code --skill iterate-ncy08

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Revise implementation plans based on review feedback or freeform user input, ensuring changes remain aligned with the original goals and context.

Core Features & Use Cases

Surgical, research-backed revisions to existing plans by reading feedback, classifying edits, applying consistency rules, and preserving coherence.
Conditional agent delegation: dispatch codebase-locator, codebase-analyzer, and other sub-agents only when edits require new technical understanding.
Route the plan to the next pipeline step (review or implement) based on verdicts and revision limits.

Quick Start

Invoke /iterate after receiving a plan and feedback to begin surgical revisions.

Frequently Asked Questions about iterate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate implementation plan revisions based on review feedback?▼

Surgical plan revisions preserve coherence by enforcing frontmatter integrity and manifest consistency. The revision loop reads review feedback, classifies edits, and applies consistency rules to maintain alignment with original goals and context.

How does conditional agent coordination work during planning workflows?▼

Conditional agent delegation dispatches codebase-locator and codebase-analyzer sub-agents only when plan edits require new technical understanding. This optimizes agent coordination by avoiding unnecessary delegation during routine revisions.

When do I need to enforce frontmatter integrity and manifest consistency in software engineering plans?▼

Enforce frontmatter integrity and manifest consistency when applying surgical revisions to implementation plans. This maintains plan coherence when routing between review and implement phases based on verdicts and revision limits.

Can I route implementation plans to the next pipeline step automatically after revisions?▼

Route implementation plans to the next pipeline step automatically based on review verdicts and revision limits. The iteration loop evaluates feedback and directs the plan to either the review or implement phase.

What is the best way to handle freeform edits within a structured planning workflow?▼

Handle freeform edits within a planning workflow by reading feedback, classifying edits, and applying consistency rules. This surgical revision approach ensures freeform changes remain aligned with original goals and context.