iterate_plan_nt

To update an implementation plan without the thoughts directory, apply user feedback directly to the plan file. This approach enforces surgical edits to scope, phases, and success criteria while preserving the existing plan structure and formatting for projects using a non-standard setup.

You iterate on a codebase plan without thoughts-locator components when your project uses a non-standard thoughts setup. This is needed to adjust timelines, scope, or add validation phases without introducing standard thoughts-analyzer dependencies into the project.

Yes, you can adjust scope, success criteria, and milestones while preserving plan structure. The iteration process applies surgical edits that maintain phase sequencing and validates changes against the plan's existing formatting and required fields.

The best way to apply user feedback to an existing implementation plan is through direct, surgical edits to the plan file. This method updates milestones and phases without relying on thoughts-analyzer components, ensuring formatting and required fields remain validated.

Yes, plan iteration works for projects without a standard thoughts directory. It updates plans by applying feedback directly, bypassing the need for thoughts-locator or thoughts-analyzer components while enforcing surgical edits and validating formatting.

A limitation of iterating without the thoughts-analyzer is that you bypass standard thoughts directory integration. The process relies solely on direct plan file edits, enforcing surgical updates and validation against existing formatting without analyzing external thought dependencies.