jinn-explore

Identify tradeoffs, risks, and missing context in Linear issues.

1|Updated Sep 2, 2019
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hackefeller/hominem --skill jinn-explore
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: jinn-explore
Source: https://github.com/hackefeller/hominem/tree/main/.claude/skills/jinn-explore
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hackefeller/hominem --skill jinn-explore

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Streamline the discovery of tradeoffs, risks, and missing context in Linear issues or projects, reducing uncertainty before committing to a path.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Tradeoff mapping: identify and document open decisions, unknowns, and dependencies within a Linear issue or project.
  • Risk assessment: surface risk areas and potential failure modes to inform prioritization.
  • Decision traceability: capture conclusions and rationale for future audit and handoffs.

Quick Start

Ask Linear MCP to outline open questions, options, and data needs to reach a documented decision.

Frequently Asked Questions about jinn-explore

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify tradeoffs and risks in a Linear issue?

To identify tradeoffs and risks in a Linear issue, you can use Linear MCP tooling to read the issue and map open questions, dependencies, and potential failure modes into a structured decision-making analysis.

What is the best way to document decisions and missing context for Linear projects?

Documenting decisions and missing context for Linear projects involves capturing conclusions and rationale directly within the issue using Linear MCP, producing a structured analysis that ensures decision traceability for future audits and handoffs.

Can I use Linear MCP to map open questions when a decision is pending?

Yes, you can use Linear MCP to map open questions and options when a decision is pending by reading existing Linear work to surface unknowns and data needs required to reach a documented conclusion.

Does tradeoff mapping in Linear work for issue and project level risk analysis?

Tradeoff mapping in Linear works for both issue and project level risk analysis by surfacing risk areas and potential failure modes, reducing uncertainty and informing prioritization before committing to a path.

How do I outline data needs to reach a documented decision in Linear?

To outline data needs for a documented decision in Linear, apply tradeoff mapping to existing work to identify missing context, then use Linear MCP to document the required data and structured analysis for decision making.