journaling

To write an incident response postmortem, aggregate context from recent git history, diffs, error logs, and test outputs. Synthesize a timeline of events, identify root causes, and save the structured markdown entry to docs/retros with a date-topic filename.

Documenting lessons learned after a debugging session involves capturing structured notes that summarize the timeline, what worked and failed, and explicit action items. The entry is saved as a markdown file under docs/journal for future reference.

Yes, you can generate a retrospective by prompting the tool to review recent git diffs, error logs, and relevant plan files. It assembles the context to build a timeline, surface root causes, and produce a concise journal entry.

No external dependencies are required to capture session notes. The tool operates independently to aggregate context from your local git history and project files, synthesizing the information into structured markdown files.

To structure a postmortem for a completed feature, extract context from git diffs and plan files to build a timeline of decisions and outcomes. Summarize the rationale and lessons learned into a compact markdown entry under docs/journal.

Automated journaling may not suit team retrospectives if the critical decisions and context were not captured in git history, diffs, or plan files. It relies on extracting technical context to synthesize timelines and root causes accurately.