js-set-map-lookups

Replace array.includes() membership checks with native Set/Map lookups.

2.0k|117|Updated Mar 27, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/TheOrcDev/8bitcn-ui --skill js-set-map-lookups
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: js-set-map-lookups
Source: https://github.com/TheOrcDev/8bitcn-ui/tree/main/.claude/skills/js-set-map-lookups
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TheOrcDev/8bitcn-ui --skill js-set-map-lookups

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill replaces repeated O(n) membership tests performed with array.includes() by using native Set/Map lookups, delivering faster performance in data processing tasks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Use Set.has and Map.has for constant-time membership checks.
  • Seamlessly convert array-based lookups to Set/Map lookups in existing code.
  • Use Case: efficiently filter large collections by an allowed-id set or validate items against a permitted set.

Quick Start

Replace a typical array.includes membership test with Set.has by initializing a Set with the allowed identifiers and using has() in the lookup, e.g., new Set(['a','b',...]) and items.filter(item => allowed.has(item.id)).

Frequently Asked Questions about js-set-map-lookups

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I speed up membership checks in JavaScript with large datasets?

Replace array.includes() with Set.has() for O(1) constant-time lookups instead of O(n) scans. Set membership checks are dramatically faster on large collections because they use hash-based lookup rather than linear iteration.

When should I use Set instead of array for checking if an item exists?

Use Set when you perform frequent membership tests on collections with many items. Set.has() stays fast regardless of size, while array.includes() slows down proportionally. For small arrays checked once, the difference is negligible.

Can I convert an existing array.includes() check to Set.has() in my codebase?

Yes. Initialize a Set from your array with new Set(array), then replace item.includes(value) with set.has(value). Both use native JavaScript with no dependencies, making the conversion straightforward in any JavaScript or TypeScript project.

How do I filter a large collection by an allowed set of IDs?

Create a Set from allowed IDs, then filter the collection using set.has() to check each item. This pattern executes in linear time with constant-time lookups, replacing slower array.includes() filtering that performs quadratic operations.

What's the difference between using Set and Map for lookups?

Set stores unique values and checks membership with has(). Map stores key-value pairs and checks keys with has(). Both offer O(1) lookup; use Set for membership tests and Map when you need to associate data with each item.

Does Set.has() work with TypeScript the same way as JavaScript?

Yes. Set and Map are native JavaScript structures with full TypeScript support. You can use generic types like Set<string> or Map<string, number> to ensure type safety while maintaining O(1) performance.