skills.rest
aussiegingersnap
aussiegingersnapCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
𝕏@jasontoevsGitHub

judge

Assess completed work outputs against defined criteria and produce pass/fail verdicts.

9|2|Updated Jan 31, 2026
Search Tags:#feedback#documentation#code-review#acceptance-criteria#quality-review#judge
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/aussiegingersnap/cursor-skills --skill judge-aussiegingersnap
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: judge
Source: https://github.com/aussiegingersnap/cursor-skills/tree/main/skills/judge
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aussiegingersnap/cursor-skills --skill judge-aussiegingersnap

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Verifies complex work against established criteria to ensure high-quality outcomes and adherence to specs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Pass/fail determination based on acceptance criteria
  • Actionable feedback with issue highlights and remediation steps
  • Suitable for code reviews, design validation, and documentation checks

Quick Start

Provide the completed work output for evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions about judge

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify completed work against acceptance criteria before a commit?▼

You can verify completed work by assessing outputs against defined acceptance criteria to determine a pass or fail verdict. The review highlights issues with evidence and provides actionable remediation guidance to ensure alignment before committing.

What is a quality review for complex code changes?▼

A quality review for complex changes evaluates completed work outputs against established criteria to ensure high-quality outcomes and adherence to specs. It produces a pass/fail determination, lists issues with evidence, and offers actionable feedback for remediation.

Can I use this for multi-file code reviews and documentation checks?▼

Yes, this quality review is suitable for multi-file code reviews, design validation, and documentation checks. It assesses completed work outputs against defined criteria to produce a pass/fail verdict and actionable remediation guidance across these contexts.

What's the best way to get actionable feedback on issues found during a quality review?▼

The best way to get actionable feedback is to provide completed work outputs for evaluation. The review produces a pass/fail verdict and lists issues with evidence, offering specific remediation steps to guide corrections.

When do I need a pass/fail determination for my work outputs?▼

You need a pass/fail determination when verifying complex work against established criteria to ensure high-quality outcomes. Apply it after atomic skills complete, during multi-file reviews, or before commits to confirm alignment with acceptance criteria.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
thewind121212thewind121212

topic-creator

Ground user ideas in repo state and C3 architecture into implementable Stories.

Community
Intermediate
Alex1980AlexAlex1980Alex

windows-hooks-paths

Diagnose Windows path escaping issues in Claude Code hooks and provide remediation steps.

Community
Advanced
OmexITOmexIT
13

evidence-review

Verify test outputs, build logs, and screenshots before shipping features.

Community
Advanced
alangebalangeb

code-review-workflow

Run pyscan, pyanalyze, ruff, and black to generate a unified markdown report.

Community
Intermediate