judge-pentest

Identify and document untested attack surfaces during penetration testing.

1.6k|234|Updated Dec 7, 2019
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wgpsec/AboutSecurity --skill judge-pentest
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: judge-pentest
Source: https://github.com/wgpsec/AboutSecurity/tree/main/skills/general/judge-pentest
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wgpsec/AboutSecurity --skill judge-pentest

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The skill provides a structured checklist to evaluate penetration testing coverage, ensuring all attack surfaces are tested and gaps are clearly identified for remediation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Web application vulnerability coverage check and consolidated feedback
  • Iterative evaluation logic that guides rounds of testing and improvement
  • Generate concrete, actionable remediation prompts for security teams

Quick Start

Run the penetration testing evaluation to generate a coverage report for your target application and identify untested attack surfaces.

Frequently Asked Questions about judge-pentest

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check penetration testing coverage for untested attack surfaces?

Penetration testing coverage checks identify untested attack surfaces by evaluating tested vectors against a structured checklist, generating consolidated gap analysis reports for security teams to remediate.

What is penetration testing gap analysis and when do I need a coverage checklist?

Penetration testing gap analysis is the process of identifying untested attack surfaces in web applications. You need it when verifying that security teams have tested critical vectors before deployment.

How do I generate actionable remediation feedback for security teams after pentest?

To generate remediation feedback, use a structured template that documents untested attack surfaces and provides explicit remediation steps, guiding iterative testing rounds until completeness is achieved.

Does the penetration testing evaluation work with mixed software ecosystems?

Yes, the penetration testing evaluation works with both web applications and mixed software ecosystems, guiding security teams through coverage checks and feedback generation across multiple engagement rounds.

What completeness threshold does the pentest evaluation logic require?

The pentest evaluation logic marks completeness when 90% or more of the attack surfaces are tested, triggering the final structured feedback template to provide explicit remediation steps for remaining gaps.

Why use an iterative evaluation process for penetration testing coverage?

An iterative evaluation process drives continuous improvement by guiding multiple rounds of testing and gap analysis, ensuring untested attack surfaces are progressively identified and remediated across engagement rounds.