judge

Evaluate items using CYNIC's 25-dimension framework to produce a Q-Score and verdict.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zeyxx/CYNIC --skill judge-zeyxx
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: judge
Source: https://github.com/zeyxx/CYNIC/tree/main/.claude/skills/judge
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zeyxx/CYNIC --skill judge-zeyxx

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Evaluates any item using CYNIC's 25-dimension judgment system to produce a quantitative Q-Score, a qualitative verdict, and a detailed breakdown across the 25 dimensions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 25-dimension evaluation across four axioms (PHI, VERIFY, CULTURE, BURN)
  • Outputs include Q-Score, Verdict, Confidence, and per-dimension breakdown
  • Use cases include evaluating code, tokens, decisions, patterns, or content to obtain structured judgments for guidance and risk assessment

Quick Start

Invoke the judge with the item you want evaluated, for example: /judge <item_to_evaluate>.

Frequently Asked Questions about judge

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate code quality across multiple dimensions?

You can evaluate code quality using a 25-dimension judgment framework that outputs a quantitative Q-Score, a qualitative verdict, and a per-dimension breakdown to guide decisions and assess risks.

What is a multi-dimensional framework for content evaluation?

A multi-dimensional framework for content evaluation applies 25 dimensions across four axioms—PHI, VERIFY, CULTURE, and BURN—to produce a structured Q-Score, verdict, and detailed breakdown.

Can I use automated evaluation to judge decisions and patterns?

Yes, automated evaluation can judge decisions, patterns, or tokens by applying the 25-dimension framework to generate a Q-Score, a verdict, and a confidence level suitable for AI decision workflows.

How do I get a structured risk assessment for AI-generated tokens?

To get a structured risk assessment for AI-generated tokens, apply a 25-dimension evaluation system that outputs a Q-Score, a qualitative verdict, and a detailed breakdown across four core axioms.

What is the best way to score content quality for AI workflows?

The best way to score content quality for AI workflows is using a 25-dimension judgment system that produces structured results, including a quantitative Q-Score and a qualitative verdict for integration.

Does the evaluation framework require external dependencies?

No, the evaluation framework requires no external dependencies, allowing you to directly invoke the judgment skill on any item to obtain its Q-Score and 25-dimension breakdown.