judgment-document-generation

Generate complete Chinese criminal judgments from case facts and evidence.

Updated Mar 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zizhenchen47-oss/claude-skills --skill judgment-document-generation-zizhenchen47-oss
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: judgment-document-generation
Source: https://github.com/zizhenchen47-oss/claude-skills/tree/main/judgment-document-generation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zizhenchen47-oss/claude-skills --skill judgment-document-generation-zizhenchen47-oss

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

这个 Skill 解决刑事一审判决书撰写中事实提取不全、法律适用不准、论证链条断裂和文书格式不规范的问题,帮助把案件事实快速转化为结构完整、说理严密的正式裁判文书。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 全流程判决书生成:从案件事实、证据概要和辩护意见中提取关键要素,形成可直接用于判决书的结构化材料。
  • 法律适用与争点回应:自动识别罪名、犯罪形态、共犯地位、量刑情节和争议焦点,并完成条文检索与裁判说理。
  • 规范化文书输出:按照刑事判决书的首部、事实、理由、主文和尾部组织内容,同时统一法律术语与表述风格。
  • 适用场景:适合需要生成诈骗、盗窃等刑事案件一审判决书的法务、律师、研究人员或法律 AI 工作流。

Quick Start

请提供案件事实、指控罪名、证据摘要、辩护意见和量刑情节,并要求该 Skill 输出一份完整、规范的中文刑事判决书。

Frequently Asked Questions about judgment-document-generation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a complete criminal judgment from case facts and evidence?

You generate a criminal judgment by inputting case facts, charges, evidence summaries, and sentencing factors. The system extracts key elements, performs statute lookup, and applies deductive reasoning to output a formal court document with standardized terminology.

What is the process for drafting first-instance criminal judgments with legal AI?

Drafting first-instance criminal judgments with AI involves fact extraction, legal concept analysis, dispute issue identification, statute lookup, precedent comparison, and formatting standard court sections including facts, reasons, and disposition.

Can I use this for complex criminal cases involving multiple defendants and sentencing factors?

Yes, it supports first-instance criminal cases requiring fact extraction, statute lookup, and formal judgment formatting. It identifies crime forms, accomplice roles, and sentencing circumstances to ensure comprehensive issue coverage and rigorous legal reasoning.

How does the system handle statute lookup and precedent comparison during court writing?

During court writing, the system analyzes charges and legal concepts to perform statute lookup, compares precedents, and applies deductive reasoning to resolve dispute issues, ensuring the judgment's reasoning chain remains logically continuous and legally accurate.

What are the limitations of automated criminal judgment generation?

Automated criminal judgment generation is limited to first-instance criminal cases. It requires complete inputs like case facts, evidence summaries, and defense opinions to function properly, relying on retry logic and issue coverage checks to mitigate drafting errors.