judicial-value-judgment

Name: judicial-value-judgment
Availability: InStock
Author: maryhu-yr

Identify value judgments and outline auditable judicial reasoning frameworks.

Updated May 28, 2026

Search Tags:#case-law #discretion #proportionality #judicial-analysis #value-conflict #reasoned-judgment

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/MaryHu-YR/Legal-Skills-Chinese-w-MCP --skill judicial-value-judgment

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: judicial-value-judgment
Source: https://github.com/MaryHu-YR/Legal-Skills-Chinese-w-MCP/tree/main/skills/judicial-value-judgment
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MaryHu-YR/Legal-Skills-Chinese-w-MCP --skill judicial-value-judgment

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps judges identify when value judgments are required and provides a structured, auditable framework to analyze conflicts and articulate reasoning without substituting the judge's final decision.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured conflict identification and problem classification across rights, discretion, and proportionality.
Stepwise evaluation of legal values (order, liberty, equality, rights, justice, efficiency) with concrete justification.
Production of a defendable裁量 reasoning framework and a ready-to-apply decision outline for opinions.

Quick Start

Provide a ready-to-use value-judgment analysis template that judges can adapt to the case at hand.

Frequently Asked Questions about judicial-value-judgment

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I identify when a case requires judicial value judgments?▼

Judicial value judgments are required when a case involves rights conflicts, discretion bounds, or proportionality concerns. This framework classifies legal problems to identify these situations and outlines a structured decision framework across civil, administrative, and constitutional contexts.

What is the best way to structure judicial reasoning for conflicting legal values?▼

To structure judicial reasoning, apply a stepwise evaluation of legal values like order, liberty, equality, rights, justice, and efficiency. This approach specifies the normative basis, relevant facts, and justification steps to produce an auditable reasoning outline.

How do I create an auditable proportionality analysis for administrative discretion?▼

Create an auditable proportionality analysis by applying the decision framework to the bounds of administrative discretion. Specify the normative basis, relevant facts, and justification steps to produce an auditable reasoning outline for your judicial opinion.

Does this judicial analysis framework substitute the judge's final decision?▼

This framework does not substitute the judge's final decision. It provides a structured analytical template to evaluate value conflicts and articulate auditable reasoning, leaving the final ruling entirely to the judge.

Can I apply a structured value judgment framework across constitutional and civil cases?▼

You can apply this value judgment framework across civil, administrative, and constitutional contexts. It identifies value conflicts and proportionality concerns to produce a consistent decision outline adaptable to various legal domains.