jules-review

Coordinate an AI council to review Jules pull requests and post structured findings.

10|2|Updated Feb 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rube-de/cc-skills --skill jules-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: jules-review
Source: https://github.com/rube-de/cc-skills/tree/main/plugins/jules-review/skills/jules-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rube-de/cc-skills --skill jules-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Streamlines and standardizes PR reviews by Jules, using an AI council to ensure consistent, thorough feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Council-driven PR reviews: coordinates Jules PR reviews using an AI council to generate structured findings and a verdict.
  • Inline comments and body summary: posts inline comments on changed lines when possible and a formal PR body summary.
  • Workflow-guided posting: follows the WORKFLOW.md formatting rules for posting results and handles fallback to PR comments if needed.

Quick Start

Run /jules-review on the current PR to generate a council-based review and post results.

Frequently Asked Questions about jules-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate GitHub PR reviews for AI-generated pull requests?

You can automate GitHub PR reviews for AI-generated pull requests by running the /jules-review command, which coordinates an AI council to analyze changes and post structured findings with a final verdict.

What is an AI council workflow for code review?

An AI council workflow for code review coordinates multiple AI agents to evaluate pull requests, generating structured findings, inline comments on changed lines, and a formal summary verdict for consistent feedback.

How do I post inline comments and a summary on a pull request automatically?

To post inline comments and a summary on a pull request automatically, the workflow follows formatting rules from references/WORKFLOW.md to validate inline-diffs and append a formal PR body summary.

What happens if API access is unavailable during an automated PR review?

If API access is unavailable during an automated PR review, the workflow triggers a safe fallback mechanism to post results directly as standard PR comments instead of inline annotations.

Can I run a full-depth code analysis on Jules pull requests across repositories?

Yes, you can run full-depth code analysis on Jules pull requests across repositories by invoking the review command, which supports both quick reviews and comprehensive inline-diff validation.

Do I need specific workflow files to format and post code review results?

Yes, you need the SKILL.md workflow and references/WORKFLOW.md files to properly format code review results, validate inline-diffs, and post structured findings to the pull request.