What problem does it solve? Brazilian judicial proceedings can span hundreds of pages across petitions, answers, sentences, and appeals, forcing lawyers to spend days manually cross-referencing pieces for contradictions, deadlines, and argument evolution. This Skill automates that forensic reading, producing a structured analysis in minutes. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Piece-level extraction and classification: Extracts PDF text (pdftotext, pypdf, OCR fallback) and chunks proceedings into 27 types of procedural pieces, then analyzes each chunk with schema-validated structured output. - Contradiction and instance tracking: Maps contradictions between parties, tracks arguments across instances (1st instance, TJ, STJ, STF), and detects binding precedents and Art. 942 CPC situations. - Deadline and risk computation: Calculates CPC Art. 219-232 deadlines with forensic holidays and recess, recalculates monetary awards under Lei 14.905/2024, and scores procedural, merit, and monetary risk. - Use Case: A solo litigation lawyer drops a 150-page case PDF and receives an executive REPORT.md with chronological piece table, verbatim-cited contradictions, urgent deadline alerts, strategic recommendations per party, and a navigable Obsidian vault. ## Quick Start Ask Claude Code to run /juriscan on the path to your case PDF, for example by saying: analyze the judicial proceeding at ~/Downloads/processo.pdf and show me the contradictions, deadlines, and risk report.