kelly-agent-eval

Run local LLM-agent regression reviews against a baseline with mock test cases.

4|3|Updated Feb 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mr-kelly/skills --skill kelly-agent-eval
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: kelly-agent-eval
Source: https://github.com/mr-kelly/skills/tree/main/skills/kelly-agent-eval
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mr-kelly/skills --skill kelly-agent-eval

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires hono, @hono/node-server, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill solves the challenge of maintaining quality in LLM-agent workflows by providing a structured, deterministic way to catch regressions before a release. It prevents quality drift by comparing new agent versions against a established baseline using a fixed suite of test cases.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Regression Detection: Automatically identifies cases where a candidate agent version scores lower than the baseline on a four-part rubric.
  • Review Workflow: Provides a local dashboard to triage regressions, record human decisions, and approve or block releases.
  • Use Case: Before deploying a new version of a support agent, use this board to verify that the new model maintains performance across support, reasoning, and safety categories without introducing new errors.

Quick Start

Use the kelly-agent-eval skill to open the local review board and triage the current candidate agent regressions.

Frequently Asked Questions about kelly-agent-eval

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I catch LLM agent regressions before a release?

Testing agent performance regressions requires running a fixed suite of mock test cases against a candidate version. It compares results against a baseline version using a four-part rubric to identify quality drift in support, reasoning, and safety categories.

How does a local review board manage human-in-the-loop release decisions?

A local review board manages human-in-the-loop release decisions by providing a dashboard to triage detected regressions, record human decisions, and approve or block releases based on deterministic test outcomes.

Do I need a local environment to run agent regression testing with Hono?

Yes, agent regression testing with Hono requires a local environment to execute the server. It relies on local execution to run the Hono-based server and manage handoff files for release reporting.

What is the best way to evaluate agent quality drift?

The best way to evaluate agent quality drift is to compare new agent versions against an established baseline. This approach automatically identifies cases where a candidate agent scores lower on a four-part rubric.

When should I use a baseline comparison for agent quality assurance?

You should use a baseline comparison for agent quality assurance before deploying a new version. This verifies that the new model maintains performance across categories without introducing new errors.