kickoff

Multi-agent meetings coordinate diverse perspectives by spawning agents for adversarial reviews and multi-perspective analysis. They enforce a phase-driven workflow to converge on a single, defensible recommendation with structured reporting and clear next steps.

Getting a defensible recommendation requires gathering diverse viewpoints to challenge assumptions. Adversarial reviews and collaborative problem solving converge multiple perspectives into a unified decision, documented in a formal report with consensus and debate points.

A phase-driven workflow manages team assembly across three stages: Phase 0 selects the agent team based on context, Phase 1 spawns agents and assigns prompts, and Phase 2 compiles findings and presents the final recommendation.

Multi-agent collaboration supports selecting both named participants and ad-hoc agents for team assembly. This flexibility ensures the appropriate agent team is chosen based on the specific task and context requirements.

Multi-agent structured reporting includes consensus, debate points, key findings, and recommended next steps. It produces a formal kickoff report after the collaborative analysis phase, then cleans up the meeting state.

Adversarial reviews should be used when collaborative problem solving requires diverse viewpoints to challenge assumptions. They are essential for tasks needing deep analysis to ensure final recommendations are defensible across multiple perspectives.