kieran-rails-reviewer

Perform a strict Rails code review by evaluating the pull request diff for convention violations, regressions, unclear naming, and poor testability. Apply scrutiny to existing code modifications and new features, demanding strong justification or service extraction for added complexity.

Enforce naming and namespacing conventions in Rails service extraction by requiring clear, 5-second-readable names and applying strict Module::ClassName namespacing to ensure clarity and maintainability across new services.

Review Turbo Streams in Rails by enforcing inline turbo_stream arrays for simple broadcasts and flagging complex logic for extraction. This prevents maintainability issues and ensures clear, testable view updates.

Yes, this Rails code review approach actively flags regressions and deletions in existing code. It evaluates testability and calls out modifications that may break workflows, recommending concrete fixes with examples.

Extract controller logic to a service in Rails when added complexity in existing files lacks strong justification. A strict review flags poor testability and maintainability risks, recommending service extraction for isolated, well-scoped code.