Generate a hostile rejection memo and adjudicate attacks on academic papers.
npx skills add https://github.com/goupup-ai/miccai25 --skill kill-argument-goupup-ai
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: kill-argument Source: https://github.com/goupup-ai/miccai25/tree/main/ARIS/skills/kill-argument Command: npx skills add https://github.com/goupup-ai/miccai25 --skill kill-argument-goupup-ai
Standard balanced paper reviews often miss the single most damaging rejection argument that would cause a senior area chair to reject a submission, leaving critical headline-vs-body gaps unaddressed until after submission.
Use the kill-argument skill to run an adversarial review of your paper in the directory 'your-paper-folder/' before final submission.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
An adversarial review simulates a hostile reviewer constructing the strongest possible rejection memo targeting your paper's weakest claims, followed by an independent adjudicator defending the paper point-by-point to classify attacks as answered, partially answered, or unresolved.
Adversarial review simulation for rebuttal preparation works by using a fresh AI reviewer thread to construct a 200-word rejection memo, then employing another thread to defend the paper point-by-point and classify each attack as answered, partially answered, or unresolved.
Yes, you can use adversarial review to check theory papers with theorem-class claims. The workflow specifically applies to pre-submission review of theory papers, targeting headline-vs-body gaps and theorem audits to prevent avoidable rejections.
The best way to pre-check high-stakes empirical papers with broad scope claims is running a two-thread adversarial review that surfaces the most damaging rejection arguments and provides a structured verdict with actionable fix recommendations.
A limitation of automated pre-submission checks is that they rely on AI threads to predict objections, meaning they may not replace human senior area chairs but rather surface avoidable headline-vs-body gaps before conference submissions.
EurecaMomentExtract claims with supporting evidence from paper collections for AI benchmarks.
Unified-Field-Theory-ResearchGenerate structured responses to referee reports for scholarly manuscripts.
NimbleBrainIncReview white papers for citation integrity and technical accuracy.
shawnpetrosProduce thesis-grade research with evidence grading and verified citations.
