kiro-review

Review task implementations against approved specs, boundaries, and verification evidence.

1.5k|242|Updated Feb 16, 2017
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/growilabs/growi --skill kiro-review-growilabs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: kiro-review
Source: https://github.com/growilabs/growi/tree/main/.claude/skills/kiro-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/growilabs/growi --skill kiro-review-growilabs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Review task implementations against approved specs, boundaries, and verification evidence to ensure alignment and readiness for acceptance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces alignment with requirements and design documents
  • Verifies boundary constraints and task scope
  • Provides mechanical verification results and suggested remediation

Quick Start

Run kiro-review on the current task diff to determine if the submission meets approved specs and boundaries.

Frequently Asked Questions about kiro-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate a task implementation against approved specs and requirements?

Spec validation reviews task diffs against requirements.md, design.md, and tasks.md to enforce alignment with boundary constraints. It provides mechanical verification results to determine acceptance readiness after an implementer reports completion.

What is task boundary compliance and how does mechanical verification work?

Task boundary compliance ensures implementation diffs stay within approved scope. Mechanical verification applies automated checks against task artifacts and diff output to document whether boundary concepts and evidence align with approved specs.

How do I perform diff analysis before accepting a task as complete?

Diff analysis for task acceptance requires accessing task artifacts including requirements.md, design.md, and tasks.md alongside the implementer's status and diff output. The review enforces strict evaluation with mechanical checks to verify alignment across boundary concepts and evidence.

Do I need requirements.md and design.md files to run task spec validation?

Yes, task spec validation requires access to task artifacts including requirements.md, design.md, and tasks.md. These files provide the approved specs and task boundaries needed to enforce alignment and verify scope compliance against the implementation diff.

When should I run spec validation and boundary checks in the development workflow?

Run spec validation and boundary checks after an implementer reports READY_FOR_REVIEW, after remediation, or before accepting a task as complete. This timing ensures alignment is verified when the implementation diff is ready for mechanical verification and documented outcomes.

What's the best way to verify boundary compliance and get remediation suggestions?

The best way to verify boundary compliance is running a rigorous review against approved specs, task boundaries, and verification evidence. This enforces strict evaluation with mechanical checks and provides suggested remediation to address alignment gaps before acceptance.