kiro-spec-design

To translate requirements into a technical design blueprint, you need a process that maps the WHAT to HOW through discovery and synthesis, defining explicit boundaries, clear interfaces, and a structured file plan for implementation.

Architecture traceability to numeric requirements is ensured by generating a design draft that explicitly links technical decisions and interfaces back to the original requirement numbers, making the design evaluable during reviews.

Defining clear boundaries and interfaces from feature requirements involves gathering steering context to scope the design, then applying lightweight synthesis to map functional needs into concrete architectural components.

Yes, you can generate a deliverable-ready design draft directly from a feature name by invoking a guided discovery process that gathers context, synthesizes architecture, and outputs an implementation plan with explicit boundaries.

You need a formal design review for your architecture when the technical design draft must be evaluated against explicit boundaries, interface definitions, and traceable numeric requirements before moving into implementation.

Yes, this approach works for mapping steering context to a file structure plan by synthesizing the gathered context into a concrete blueprint that outlines the exact file organization needed for implementation.