kiro-validate-design

Validate a design spec by running an interactive technical review on your design.md, requirements.md, and spec.json files to identify critical issues and produce a GO/NO-GO decision. This ensures implementation readiness and reduces rework.

A go-no-go design review assesses implementation readiness by identifying up to three critical issues in your feature specifications and providing a balanced pass/fail rationale with actionable remediation steps before task generation.

Check implementation readiness by applying interactive spec validation to your requirements.md and spec.json files. The review identifies boundary violations and unmet constraints, then outputs a GO/NO-GO rationale with prioritized next steps.

Yes, interactive design reviews engage you with targeted questions and propose alternative approaches when necessary. The process detects up to three highest-priority concerns that would block or impair implementation while respecting steering context.

You need a spec validation review in spec-driven projects to validate design.md, requirements.md, and spec.json files before task generation or implementation. It prevents costly rework by catching boundary violations and unmet constraints early.

Yes, the design validation review respects your steering context and language settings while conducting the technical quality assessment. It provides prioritized, actionable remediation steps aligned with your project's established constraints.