kiro-validate-design

Review technical design documents and return GO/NO-GO decisions with prioritized critical issues.

Updated Apr 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/manatago/gion --skill kiro-validate-design-manatago
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: kiro-validate-design
Source: https://github.com/manatago/gion/tree/main/.claude/skills/kiro-validate-design
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/manatago/gion --skill kiro-validate-design-manatago

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps product and engineering teams quickly determine whether a technical design is ready for implementation by identifying the most critical risks, verifying alignment with requirements and architecture, and producing a clear GO/NO-GO recommendation with actionable next steps.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Interactive design validation: Reads spec.json, requirements.md, and design.md for a feature and engages the designer to clarify intent and tradeoffs.
  • Focused risk identification: Limits findings to the top three critical issues with traceability to requirements and evidence from the design document.
  • Decision & next steps: Produces a concise GO/NO-GO decision, rationale, and concrete remediation or task-generation steps, respecting steering context and language settings.
  • Use case: Run a pre-implementation review for a new feature to surface architectural misalignments, missing requirements traceability, or maintainability concerns before engineering work starts.

Quick Start

Run an interactive GO/NO-GO review for the feature named "checkout" by loading its spec and design documents and produce the prioritized critical issues and next steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about kiro-validate-design

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a GO/NO-GO technical design review before implementation?

A technical design review validates architecture alignment, requirements traceability, and extensibility by reading spec.json, requirements.md, and design.md to produce a GO/NO-GO decision with prioritized critical issues.

What is requirements traceability validation in a pre-implementation design review?

Requirements traceability validation checks that design documents explicitly map to requirements, ensuring architecture alignment and type safety before engineering work starts. It identifies up to three critical gaps needing remediation.

How do I validate architecture alignment and design consistency for a new feature?

You validate architecture alignment by loading feature-level spec and design documents into an interactive review process that engages the designer to clarify tradeoffs, surfacing maintainability concerns and missing traceability.

Can I limit technical design review findings to only the most critical issues?

Yes, design validation can limit findings to the top three prioritized critical issues with evidence from the design document, providing clear rationale and concrete remediation steps instead of an exhaustive list.

When do I need a design validation check for implementation readiness?

You need design validation before starting engineering work on a new feature to surface architectural misalignments, verify type safety, and ensure your steering context and language settings are respected for task generation.

Does design validation work without external dependencies or components?

Yes, interactive design validation operates without external dependencies or components, reading local spec.json, requirements.md, and design.md files directly to return actionable GO/NO-GO recommendations.