kiro-validate-design

A GO/NO-GO design review evaluates implementation readiness by comparing your architecture against project context and standards. It delivers a decision with rationale and actionable feedback to resolve critical design issues before development.

The best way to run a design review is to interactively collect and synthesize context from specs, steering documents, and architecture artifacts. This structured exploration identifies critical issues and yields a GO/NO-GO decision with actionable next steps.

Yes, you can use spec docs and steering context to identify critical design issues. By applying a structured review process against these artifacts, you surface domain constraint conflicts and validate the overall technical design quality.

A GO/NO-GO design review includes a focused analysis of critical issues and improvement opportunities, delivering a final decision with clear rationale and actionable feedback. This provides stakeholders with the confidence to proceed with implementation.

You need a structured design validation process when reviewing your design before implementation begins. It is essential for verifying that your architecture aligns with project standards and domain constraints before committing development resources.