kiro-validate-design

To conduct an interactive design review, load your feature spec and steering context to initiate a guided process that evaluates architecture, standards, and maintainability, yielding a GO/NO-GO decision with rationale.

A GO/NO-GO decision in design validation is the final outcome of an interactive review process that determines implementation readiness by assessing critical issues and strengths against your design criteria.

You validate requirements with stakeholders through interactive dialogue during the design review process, which clarifies needs, proposes feasible improvements, and aligns everyone on a solid path forward.

Yes, a design review identifies up to three critical architecture issues early by enforcing a guided validation process across your design documents, ensuring implementation readiness before development begins.

You need a guided design review process when you must ensure implementation readiness across software projects, requiring validation of architecture, standards, and stakeholder feedback before proceeding to build.

Automated design validation focuses on identifying up to three critical issues and cannot replace stakeholder dialogue, relying on interactive review to propose feasible improvements and document rationale for your GO/NO-GO decision.