kiro-verify-completion

Verify completion claims using fresh command output and exit codes.

Updated Apr 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/notta50/korenani --skill kiro-verify-completion-notta50
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: kiro-verify-completion
Source: https://github.com/notta50/korenani/tree/main/.claude/skills/kiro-verify-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/notta50/korenani --skill kiro-verify-completion-notta50

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Prevents false or premature completion claims by requiring fresh, scope-aligned evidence before accepting that a task, fix, test, or feature is complete.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Deterministic Verification Gate: Enforces a gate that identifies the exact claim, the canonical validation command, and requires fresh command output and exit codes.
  • Claim-Specific Rules: Applies tailored checks for TASK, FIX, TEST_OR_BUILD, and FEATURE_GO claims including integration, coverage, and runtime smoke checks for feature-level GO decisions.
  • Clear Outcomes & Escalation: Produces VERIFIED, NOT_VERIFIED, or MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED results with evidence, gaps, and next actions to avoid trusting stale or secondhand success reports.

Quick Start

Verify the TASK claim by identifying the canonical validation command, running it against the current code state, and reporting VERIFIED, NOT_VERIFIED, or MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED with the command output, exit code, and any coverage or integration gaps.

Frequently Asked Questions about kiro-verify-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify a bugfix is actually complete with fresh evidence?

Verifying a bugfix with fresh evidence requires running the canonical validation command against current code state and checking the fresh command output and exit codes. The result is VERIFIED, NOT_VERIFIED, or MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED with any coverage or integration gaps reported.

How do I prevent false success reports during autonomous agent task execution?

Preventing false success reports requires enforcing a deterministic verification gate that identifies the exact completion claim, runs canonical validation commands, and checks evidence-to-scope alignment before accepting any task, fix, test_or_build, or feature_go claim as complete.

What does scope-aligned evidence mean for feature_go validation scenarios?

Scope-aligned evidence means the fresh command output and exit codes directly map to the feature_go claim, including integration checks, coverage checks, and runtime smoke checks that confirm the feature is ready for a GO decision without relying on stale or secondhand reports.

When should completion verification escalate to manual verification?

Completion verification escalates to MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED when mandatory checks cannot be performed, such as when canonical validation commands are unavailable or cannot produce the fresh output and exit codes needed to confirm task, fix, test_or_build, or feature_go claims.

Can I use completion verification for CI test_or_build claims?

Yes, completion verification applies tailored checks for TEST_OR_BUILD claims during CI, requiring fresh command output and exit codes from canonical validation commands to produce VERIFIED or NOT_VERIFIED results with evidence and gaps.

What's the best way to enforce quality assurance gates for completion claims?

The best way to enforce quality assurance gates is to apply claim-specific rules for TASK, FIX, TEST_OR_BUILD, and FEATURE_GO scenarios, requiring canonical validation commands, fresh output, exit codes, and evidence-to-scope alignment checks before producing a final verification outcome.