knowledge-article-auditor

A knowledge article audit evaluates draft strength beyond surface polish by scoring criteria like misbelief, opening tension, real scenes, problem recalculation, core judgment, structure, and ending standard. It produces a structured report with a total score, verdict, and recommended fixes to guide revisions.

A structured editorial review report includes a total score, overall verdict, strongest parts, biggest problems, item-by-item scores across specific criteria, and actionable fixes. This helps writers and editors systematically raise content quality during the revision process.

Yes, this audit framework is suitable for peer reviewer processes. It provides editors, writers, and reviewers with a structured rubric to evaluate postdraft content and guide revisions based on item-by-item scoring and recommended fixes.

Knowledge articles are scored on misbelief, opening tension, real scenes, problem recalculation, core judgment, structure, and ending standard. These criteria evaluate true article strength beyond surface polish to ensure concrete structure and actionable judgment.

You need to run a postdraft article audit when your draft lacks concrete structure and actionable judgment. Applying a clear scoring rubric helps evaluate article strength and produces a scorable report you can act on to raise content quality.