knowledge-integrity

Route knowledge and decision problems to specialized governance capabilities.

Updated Jun 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/aurora-atoms/lattice --skill knowledge-integrity
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: knowledge-integrity
Source: https://github.com/aurora-atoms/lattice/tree/main/skills/knowledge-integrity
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aurora-atoms/lattice --skill knowledge-integrity

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill resolves ambiguity in decision-making and knowledge management by routing complex problems to the smallest sufficient specialist, preventing architecture drift and ensuring evidence-based trust.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Specialist Routing: Automatically selects the most appropriate capability (e.g., contradiction adjudication, assumption expiry, or decision half-life review) for a given knowledge claim.
  • Evidence-Linked Governance: Ensures all decisions are backed by traceable evidence, clear ownership, and defined review triggers.
  • Use Case: When a team encounters conflicting technical requirements, this Skill routes the issue to the contradiction-adjudication specialist to identify the single source of truth and document the rationale for future maintainers.

Quick Start

Use the knowledge-integrity skill to evaluate the current design decision against the provided evidence and determine the necessary review or adjudication path.

Frequently Asked Questions about knowledge-integrity

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I resolve conflicting technical requirements in architecture design?

Resolving conflicting technical requirements requires routing the issue to contradiction adjudication to identify a single source of truth and document the rationale for future maintainers.

What is knowledge governance for complex delivery environments?

Knowledge governance ensures decision alignment and trust by applying evidence-linked authority boundaries, clear ownership, and defined review triggers to architectural design and assumption validation.

How do I prevent architecture drift in decision-making?

Preventing architecture drift involves routing complex problems to the smallest sufficient specialist, ensuring evidence-based trust and validating assumptions before they expire.

Do I need explicit source metadata to maintain knowledge integrity?

Yes, maintaining knowledge integrity requires explicit target objects, source metadata, and evidence-linked authority boundaries to route governance problems correctly and ensure traceable ownership.

When do I need to review decision half-life in knowledge management?

Reviewing decision half-life is needed when managing knowledge trust in complex delivery environments, triggering automated evaluation of design decisions against provided evidence to determine necessary adjudication paths.

What's the best way to validate assumptions in compliance governance?

Validating assumptions in compliance governance requires specialist routing to evaluate current design decisions against provided evidence, applying defined review triggers to maintain evidence-based trust and ownership boundaries.