kramme:find-bugs:team

Orchestrate a four-teammate security review of code diffs with Agent Teams.

2|2|Updated Jan 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Abildtoft/kramme-cc-workflow --skill kramme-find-bugs-team
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: kramme:find-bugs:team
Source: https://github.com/Abildtoft/kramme-cc-workflow/tree/main/skills/kramme%3Afind-bugs%3Ateam
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Abildtoft/kramme-cc-workflow --skill kramme-find-bugs-team

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill orchestrates a team-based security review of code changes using Agent Teams to cross-validate findings and improve review quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Team-based review orchestration: Spawn a security team and delegate tasks across teammates with a shared diff and attack surface map.
  • Parallel analysis and cross-validation: Multiple reviewers check for injection, auth, data leakage, and logic issues.
  • Use cases: Large diffs, security-critical components, or when competing hypotheses are needed.

Quick Start

Run the command /kramme:find-bugs:team to start a four-teammate security review on the latest diffs.

Frequently Asked Questions about kramme:find-bugs:team

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a team-based security review on large code diffs?

A team-based security review on large code diffs is executed by spawning four teammates in delegate mode. This orchestrates parallel analysis to cross-check injection, auth, data leakage, and logic issues across the shared diff.

Do I need to enable agent teams to use parallel code analysis?

Yes, you must enable parallel code analysis with agent teams by setting the CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS environment variable. This prerequisite allows the skill to spawn multiple teammates for cross-validation.

What is the best way to cross-validate security findings in critical code changes?

The best way to cross-validate security findings is mapping attack surfaces and enforcing a structured checklist across multiple reviewers. This team-based approach produces verifiable outputs by checking competing hypotheses against the diff.

When should I use a multi-agent security review instead of a standard code review?

You should use a multi-agent security review instead of a standard code review when targeting large diffs, security-critical components, or when competing hypotheses are needed. It maps attack surfaces and cross-checks findings across multiple teammates.

Does team-based code review work without dependencies?

Yes, team-based code review works without external dependencies, but requires the CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS feature enabled. It spawns four teammates directly to execute the structured security checklist.