What problem does it solve? Pull request review rounds generate noisy feedback from bots and humans, and blindly implementing every comment wastes effort or degrades the code. This Skill critically assesses each review comment against the PR's declared review scope, decides whether to implement, push back, discuss, or file it as out of scope, and executes the decision with a full audit trail. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Complete feedback fetch: Pulls reviews, review threads, issue comments, CI state, and Copilot's suppressed comments via the GitHub CLI so no finding is missed. - Critical triage: Classifies each finding as IMPLEMENT, PUSH BACK, DISCUSS, or OUT OF SCOPE, with an isolated-vs-systemic root-cause analysis and commit-level provenance (original diff vs review-fix commit). - Attended and autonomous modes: Runs interactively with a confirmation table, or autonomously when driven by the kbabysit multi-round loop. - Round report: Produces a structured per-round report with verdicts, provenance totals, gate status, and items escalated for the human. - Use Case: After pushing code, Copilot leaves 15 findings across a PR. The Skill fetches all of them, implements the two real bugs, pushes back on style nitpicks with reasoning, files one out-of-scope defect as an issue, and posts a round report. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run kreview on the current pull request to triage and address all outstanding review comments.