krisis

Apply four ethical frameworks to user-posed dilemmas and identify tensions.

4|2|Updated Dec 31, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/TylerGarlick/abraxas --skill krisis
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: krisis
Source: https://github.com/TylerGarlick/abraxas/tree/main/skills/krisis
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TylerGarlick/abraxas --skill krisis

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you analyze complex ethical questions by systematically applying four distinct ethical frameworks, revealing points of agreement and disagreement without making the decision for you.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Framework Analysis: Simultaneously evaluates decisions using Consequentialist, Deontological, Virtue Ethics, and Care Ethics.
  • Tension & Consensus Identification: Clearly surfaces where ethical frameworks conflict and where they align.
  • Use Case: You're deciding whether to release a product with a minor known bug that affects a small user group but offers significant benefits to the majority. Use Krisis to understand the ethical implications from all four perspectives before making your choice.

Quick Start

Use the krisis skill to frame the ethical question: "Should we prioritize user privacy over data security in this new feature?"

Frequently Asked Questions about krisis

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I analyze an ethical dilemma using multiple moral philosophy frameworks?

Ethical dilemma analysis applies Consequentialist, Deontological, Virtue Ethics, and Care Ethics frameworks simultaneously to your scenario. This multi-framework deliberation identifies points of tension and consensus across ethical landscapes, helping you understand the moral implications before making a decision.

What is the best way to evaluate a product decision involving user privacy versus data security?

Evaluating product decisions involving user privacy requires applying multiple ethical frameworks to surface conflicts. By running moral philosophy deliberation across Consequentialist and Care Ethics perspectives, you can clearly identify where ethical frameworks align or disagree on the privacy versus security tradeoff.

Can I apply care ethics and deontological frameworks to the same business decision?

Yes, you can apply Care Ethics and Deontological frameworks to the same business decision. The deliberation process evaluates your dilemma through all four ethical lenses concurrently, highlighting intersections and tensions between duty-based rules and relationship-centered care.

How do I generate a report after comparing consequentialist and virtue ethics perspectives?

Generating a deliberation report happens automatically after comparing Consequentialist and Virtue Ethics perspectives. The analysis synthesizes the framework evaluations into a comprehensive report, allowing you to explore the ethical landscape and review the identified tensions and consensus points.

Does this approach make the final decision for me?

No, this ethical deliberation approach does not make the final decision for you. It systematically applies four ethical frameworks to reveal points of agreement and disagreement, allowing you to explore the ethical landscape and make your own informed choice.