Audit Kotlin code for idioms, correctness, architecture, concurrency, and safety.
npx skills add https://github.com/dantech0xff/dreams --skill kta-code-review
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: kta-code-review Source: https://github.com/dantech0xff/dreams/tree/main/.agents/skills/kta-code-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dantech0xff/dreams --skill kta-code-review
Senior Kotlin Code Reviewer provides a strict, language-agnostic evaluation of Kotlin code, identifying idioms, correctness gaps, architectural flaws, concurrency pitfalls, null-safety issues, testing gaps, performance hotspots, and potential security concerns, with citations to file:line anchors and minimal fixes.
Provide the Kotlin source or diff you want reviewed and I will return a file-and-line annotated critique with concrete, minimal fixes.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
You can review Kotlin code for idioms and concurrency by providing your source files or pull requests to receive an annotated critique. The audit produces prioritized findings with file:line anchors, identifying concurrency pitfalls, architectural flaws, and null-safety issues alongside minimal-diff fixes.
The best way to audit a Kotlin pull request for null safety and architecture is to apply a strict, framework-agnostic code review. This evaluates the diff for idiomatic correctness and architectural flaws, delivering prioritized issues with concrete, minimal fixes and defensible rationale.
Yes, you can review a specific branch diff without a DI framework because the evaluation is strictly framework-agnostic. It respects Kotlin language best practices and does not rely on any specific DI or UI stack to produce file:line annotated findings and minimal fixes.
To get actionable fixes for Kotlin static analysis findings, submit your source file, class, or module for review. The process delivers file:line annotated findings with prioritized issues and compact, minimal-diff fixes that address performance hotspots, testing gaps, and security concerns.
The limitation of framework-agnostic Kotlin code reviews is that they do not rely on or evaluate any specific DI or UI stack. The review strictly focuses on language-level best practices, idioms, and concurrency, meaning stack-specific integration issues will not be covered in the annotated findings.
SpineEventEngineConvert Java source code into idiomatic Kotlin with preserved behavior and API semantics.
mzffreyvazovReview Java code for correctness, safety, and maintainability with severity-based findings.
jr2804Analyze codebases for architecture, security, performance, and testing issues.
lagz0neAudit C3 architecture documentation against the actual codebase.
