skills.rest
jin-bo
jin-boCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

lab-standard-review

Verify laboratory standard entries against national databases and generate compliance reports.

12|2|Updated May 14, 2026
Search Tags:#document audit#standard verification#lab compliance#CNAS accreditation#standard format check#national standard query#capability scope review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jin-bo/chahua --skill lab-standard-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: lab-standard-review
Source: https://github.com/jin-bo/chahua/tree/main/examples/personas/Yvonne/skills/lab-standard-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jin-bo/chahua --skill lab-standard-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Testing and calibration laboratories face tedious, error-prone manual work when verifying that standards listed in their capability scope documents (for CNAS accreditation and internal compliance) have correct formatting, exist in official national databases, use the latest valid versions, and have accurate Chinese and English names.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Standard Information Extraction: Automatically extract standard numbers (with year codes), Chinese names, and English names from .doc/.docx/.pdf/.xlsx capability scope documents, handling both Chinese-only and bilingual standard lists.
  • Format Validation: Check standard number formatting against official rules (correct prefix capitalization, half-width symbols, proper spacing, 4-digit year codes) and flag all formatting errors with correction suggestions.
  • Official Database Verification: Query the national standards public system (std.samr.gov.cn) to confirm official standard names, publication years, and current status (current/abolished/upcoming) for each extracted standard.
  • Structured Review Reporting: Generate a clear, categorized report flagging severe errors (non-existent standards, format errors, name mismatches), warnings (outdated versions, abolished standards, minor name typos), and passed standards, with correction suggestions for all issues.
  • Use Case: A lab preparing for CNAS accreditation can upload its capability scope document to automatically audit all listed standards, reducing manual review time from hours to minutes and avoiding costly compliance oversights.

Quick Start

Use the lab-standard-review skill to verify all standards listed in the attached lab capability scope document and generate a structured compliance review report.

Frequently Asked Questions about lab-standard-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify laboratory standard methods against the national standard database for CNAS accreditation?▼

To verify laboratory standard methods for CNAS accreditation, you can automate the extraction of standard numbers and names from capability scope documents and cross-check them against the official national standards public system to confirm current status and valid versions.

What is standard format validation for laboratory capability scope documents?▼

Standard format validation is the process of checking standard numbers against official rules, verifying correct prefix capitalization, half-width symbols, proper spacing, and 4-digit year codes, to eliminate formatting errors in laboratory capability scope documents.

How do I check if testing standards in my capability scope document are abolished or outdated?▼

You can check if testing standards are abolished or outdated by querying the national standards public system to confirm the publication year and current status, flagging any non-current versions as warnings in a structured review report.

Can I extract standard information from both PDF and Excel capability scope documents?▼

Yes, you can extract standard numbers, Chinese names, and English names from .doc, .docx, .pdf, and .xlsx capability scope documents, successfully handling both Chinese-only and bilingual standard lists for compliance auditing.

How do I generate a structured compliance review report for laboratory accreditation preparation?▼

You generate a structured compliance review report by categorizing verified standards into severe errors, warnings, and passed items, providing specific correction suggestions for formatting issues, name mismatches, and non-existent standards.

What are common formatting errors when listing national standards in capability scope documents?▼

Common formatting errors include incorrect prefix capitalization, using full-width symbols instead of half-width symbols, improper spacing, and missing 4-digit year codes, which can be automatically flagged with correction suggestions during standard verification.

Related Skills

Explore More Legal & Compliance Skills→
Victory-HugoVictory-Hugo
1

markitdown

Convert PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, and other documents to Markdown.

Community
Advanced
pruizpruiz
39

report-writing

Convert vulnerability assessment data and evidence into Markdown reports.

Community
Intermediate
theandyalvarez7-rubytheandyalvarez7-ruby

fda-consultant-specialist

Identify FDA pathways and regulatory documents for medical device submissions.

Community
Advanced
antigravityos187-sketchantigravityos187-sketch

epic-tdd

Executes manual quality and safety checks for the Taco Bell brand.

Community
Advanced