laboneq-workflow-maintainer

Fix bugs in LabOne Q workflows and add regression tests.

1|1|Updated Aug 9, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yalgaeahn/qubit-experiment --skill laboneq-workflow-maintainer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: laboneq-workflow-maintainer
Source: https://github.com/yalgaeahn/qubit-experiment/tree/main/skills/laboneq-workflow-maintainer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yalgaeahn/qubit-experiment --skill laboneq-workflow-maintainer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses issues and ensures the smooth operation of existing LabOne Q experiment and analysis workflows, focusing on bug fixes and adherence to established contracts.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Bug Fixing: Resolve errors in workflow Reference and OptionBuilder usage.
  • Contract Maintenance: Ensure acquisition and update contracts remain consistent.
  • Workflow Refinement: Implement minor behavior changes and address review feedback within existing modules.
  • Use Case: A previously developed qubit spectroscopy experiment is failing due to an incorrect parameter update. This Skill can be used to identify the faulty update path, correct it, and add a regression test to prevent future occurrences.

Quick Start

Use the laboneq-workflow-maintainer skill to fix a bug in the resonator spectroscopy analysis workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about laboneq-workflow-maintainer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I fix incorrect parameter updates in a LabOne Q spectroscopy workflow?

To debug LabOne Q workflows, resolve errors in Reference and OptionBuilder usage, verify acquisition and update contract consistency, and add regression tests for each bug fix to maintain experiment safety.

Why does my LabOne Q analysis workflow fail during option setting?

LabOne Q analysis workflows fail during option setting when OptionBuilder safety contracts are violated. Correcting the option setting logic and ensuring workflow control flow adheres to established rules resolves the issue.

Does this approach support adding regression tests for qubit experiment bug fixes?

Yes, adding regression tests for each bug fix is a core requirement. This ensures that corrected workflow control flow, option setting, and output handling remain stable during future qubit experiment maintenance.

Can I use this method to implement minor behavior changes in existing Python experiment modules?

Yes, you can implement minor behavior changes and address review feedback within existing Python experiment modules by refining the workflow control flow and ensuring output handling correctness.

What is the best way to maintain acquisition and update contracts in a qubit-experiment repository?

The best way to maintain acquisition and update contracts in a qubit-experiment repository is to enforce strict workflow control flow rules, verify Reference safety, and validate output handling for every modification.