language-ext-csharp

Applies LanguageExt 4.x functional programming idioms to C# code.

1|Updated May 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vnovakovits/claude-skills --skill language-ext-csharp-vnovakovits
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: language-ext-csharp
Source: https://github.com/vnovakovits/claude-skills/tree/main/plugins/engineering-practices/skills/language-ext-csharp
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vnovakovits/claude-skills --skill language-ext-csharp-vnovakovits

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Writing or reviewing C# code that uses the LanguageExt functional library is error-prone without knowing its idioms: developers mix nulls with Option, misuse ValueUnsafe, lose errors in LINQ chains, or confuse Either with Validation. This Skill provides the mechanical patterns for LanguageExt 4.x so code uses Option, Either, Validation, Aff, and Seq correctly. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Core type guidance: Covers Option<T>, Either<L,R>, Validation<F,T>, Fin<T>, Aff<T>, Eff<T>, Seq<T>, Map<K,V>, Lst<T>, and Set<T> with construction and consumption patterns. - Composition patterns: Explains monadic composition via LINQ from/select versus applicative composition via Apply for error accumulation, plus Prelude imports and named-argument Match. - Pitfall detection: Flags ValueUnsafe usage, null/Option mixing, IsSome branching, wrong error monad selection, and Aff/Task confusion. - Use Case: When reviewing a C# repository method that chains five async calls with try/catch, use this Skill to rewrite it as a LINQ-from workflow over Aff<T> with typed errors and a single .Run() at the boundary. ## Quick Start Ask Claude to refactor this C# method's null checks and try/catch blocks into idiomatic LanguageExt Option and Aff code.

Frequently Asked Questions about language-ext-csharp

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use Option in C# with LanguageExt?▼

Create an Option<T> with Some(value), None, or Optional(possiblyNull) after adding using static LanguageExt.Prelude. Consume it with Match using named arguments (Some:, None:) or transform it with Map and Bind rather than branching on IsSome.

What is the difference between Either and Validation in LanguageExt?▼

Either<L,R> short-circuits on the first error and suits sequential workflows, while Validation<F,T> accumulates every failure and suits input parsing. Use Apply for applicative composition with Validation; LINQ from/select on Validation binds monadically and loses later errors.

How do I compose async calls with Aff in LanguageExt?▼

Chain Aff<T> values with LINQ from/select syntax, adapting Task<T> via .ToAff() and Validation via .ToAff(Error.Many). Call await aff.Run() once at the boundary, then pattern-match the resulting Fin<T> with Succ and Fail cases.

Does this LanguageExt guidance apply to version 5?▼

This guidance targets LanguageExt 4.x where async effects are Aff<T> and sync effects are Eff<T>. LanguageExt 5 reworks the abstraction into K<F, A> and renames much of the surface, so the concepts carry over but the syntax does not.

Why is ValueUnsafe a code smell in LanguageExt?▼

ValueUnsafe bypasses the type system and returns default(T), which is null for reference types, when the Option is None. That reintroduces exactly the null bug Option exists to prevent, so use Match or IfNone for extraction instead.

When should I not use LanguageExt patterns in C#?▼

Skip these patterns when the codebase does not import LanguageExt and no migration is planned, or for pure F#, Scala, or Kotlin questions since LanguageExt is a C# library. Also avoid Optional(x) on non-nullable values, which always returns Some.