legal-document-summarization

Extract six key elements from legal documents into structured summaries.

Updated May 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MaryHu-YR/Legal-Skills-Chinese-w-MCP --skill legal-document-summarization
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: legal-document-summarization
Source: https://github.com/MaryHu-YR/Legal-Skills-Chinese-w-MCP/tree/main/skills/legal-document-summarization
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MaryHu-YR/Legal-Skills-Chinese-w-MCP --skill legal-document-summarization

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

该技能的核心任务是将冗长的法律文书转化为简洁、结构化的摘要,确保信息忠实原文且可检索。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 结构化输出六要素:案件信息、事实、争议焦点、法律依据、结论、说理。
  • 适用于判决书、裁定书、调解书、仲裁裁决书、行政处罚决定书等文书的摘要与对比研究。
  • 支持跨文书类型的对比分析、教学备课与案例研究。

Quick Start

请对所提供的法律文书生成结构化六要素摘要,并确保忠实原文、中立且可检索。

Frequently Asked Questions about legal-document-summarization

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I summarize legal judgments into a structured format for research?

The six-element framework structures legal document summaries into case information, facts, issues, legal bases, conclusions, and reasoning. It ensures source-faithful extraction and neutral presentation for cross-document comparison.

Can I use this to generate structured summaries of arbitral awards and mediation documents?

Yes, this Skill processes judgments, rulings, mediations, arbitral awards, and administrative penalty decisions. It extracts structured summaries to enable cross-document comparison and case research across these document types.

How do I extract key facts and legal bases from lengthy rulings?

The Skill extracts facts, legal bases, and reasoning from rulings by isolating these elements from the source text. It presents them neutrally with clearly cited sources to maintain fidelity to the original legal document.

Does the structured legal document summarization support cross-document comparison?

Yes, the structured six-element framework enables cross-document comparison. By standardizing judgments, mediations, and arbitral awards into case information, facts, issues, legal bases, conclusions, and reasoning, it facilitates direct comparative legal research.

What is the best way to ensure legal summaries remain faithful to the original text?

To ensure faithfulness, the Skill requires neutral, source-faithful presentation with clearly cited sources. It strictly extracts the six elements from the original document without adding external information or interpretations.