legal-workflows

Orchestrates on-demand law firm workflows including case intake, draft review, and hearing preparation.

26|3|Updated Apr 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/allcolor/PawFlow-Agents --skill legal-workflows-allcolor
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: legal-workflows
Source: https://github.com/allcolor/PawFlow-Agents/tree/main/lawassist/firm.legal-assistant.pfpdir/content/skills/legal-workflows
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/allcolor/PawFlow-Agents --skill legal-workflows-allcolor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Law firm staff need structured, judgment-driven workflows for tasks like opening new cases, checking conflicts of interest, reviewing drafts, and preparing hearings, without risking automatic irreversible actions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Case Intake with Conflict Check: Structure new matters in a local SQLite dossiers table and Knowledge Graph, then run a cross-search for potential conflicts of interest presented as alerts for the lawyer to judge. - Draft Review and Letter Assembly: Review drafts against case documents for inconsistencies in dates, amounts, and party names, and assemble first-draft letters or pleadings always marked as drafts for human review. - Hearing Preparation: At J-2/J-1 before a hearing recorded in the delais table, assemble a brief with case documents, reconstructed chronology, and pending points. - Use Case: A lawyer says "new case for Ms. X"; the workflow structures the matter, flags a possible conflict with an existing adverse party, and proposes deadline entries, all pending the lawyer's explicit validation. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to open a new case for a client and run a conflict of interest check before confirming the matter.

Frequently Asked Questions about legal-workflows

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a conflict of interest check for a new legal case?▼

Trigger the intake workflow manually or by voice, and it cross-searches the dossiers table and Knowledge Graph for parties appearing on the adverse side of other firm matters. Results are presented as alerts for the lawyer to evaluate, never as automatic blocks.

How to prepare a hearing brief from case management data?▼

When a hearing-type entry in the delais table reaches J-2 or J-1, the workflow assembles a consultable brief with case documents, a reconstructed chronology, the latest pleadings, and pending points. It serves only as preparation support, never as a filing document.

Can the workflow send letters or emails automatically to clients?▼

No. None of the five workflows ever send an email or letter to a third party without an explicit human validation click. All drafted correspondence is presented as a draft to review, never as a final document.

Does the intake workflow create deadline entries automatically?▼

No. When procedural dates are identified during intake, the workflow proposes corresponding delais table entries, but they are always presented for the lawyer's validation before insertion and never recorded automatically.

What are the limitations of automated conflict checking in a law firm?▼

The cross-search only surfaces potential matches across existing dossiers and Knowledge Graph relations; it cannot conclude a conflict exists. Conflict of interest determination remains a professional judgment that the lawyer must make from the presented alerts.