linshigong

Convert LLM task execution into evidence-driven workflows with strict closure.

Updated Apr 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/menghun3-cn/linshigong --skill linshigong
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: linshigong
Source: https://github.com/menghun3-cn/linshigong/tree/main/linshigong
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/menghun3-cn/linshigong --skill linshigong

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

linshigong solves inconsistent agent outputs by enforcing “temporary worker” thinking: uncover what’s missing, tighten granularity, and close the loop with validation evidence rather than claims.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Behavioral guardrails for LLM execution: forces explicit assumptions, evidence-first reasoning, minimal-but-correct changes, and measurable success criteria for reliable delivery.
  • End-to-end closure and failure recovery: mandates searching, reading original context, validating hypotheses, attempting fundamentally different approaches, and reporting verification outputs.
  • Operational communication templates: defines the required “旁白协议” (status/pressure/completion messages) and display formatting using the referenced display protocol for consistent operator experience.

Use case examples:

  • A developer debugging a regression: apply the method to reproduce, search related patterns, validate assumptions with tools, and produce evidence-based confirmation.
  • An engineer implementing a feature: prevent over-engineering, keep edits precise, define success standards, run checks, and close related impacts across the chain.

Quick Start

Ask your AI assistant to follow the linshigong behavior protocol, then solve the current task with explicit assumptions and tool-verified results, including the required status/display output format.

Frequently Asked Questions about linshigong

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce evidence-based reasoning in LLM agent workflows?

Enforcing evidence-based reasoning in LLM agent workflows requires behavioral guardrails that mandate explicit assumption validation, tool-verified hypotheses, and measurable success criteria to prevent unproven task completion.

What is the best way to prevent AI agents from claiming a coding task is done without proof?

Preventing agents from claiming completion without proof requires an end-to-end closure protocol that mandates searching original context, validating hypotheses with tools, and reporting verification outputs before marking a task complete.

How to debug a regression with end-to-end validation using AI agents?

Debugging a regression with AI agents involves reproducing the issue, searching related patterns, validating assumptions with tools, and producing evidence-based confirmation of the fix rather than relying on unverified claims.

How do I implement end-to-end delivery guardrails for multi-step coding tasks?

Implementing end-to-end delivery guardrails for multi-step coding tasks involves defining precise minimal edits, preventing over-engineering, setting success standards, running checks, and closing impacts across the chain with verification evidence.

Does the linshigong protocol require specific dependencies or environment setup?

The linshigong protocol requires no external dependencies, relying solely on following its behavior protocol in SKILL.md and using referenced display and supporting documentation to report progress and verification evidence.

When should I use reasoning guardrails for agent workflow validation?

Reasoning guardrails for agent workflow validation should be used in coding, debugging, refactoring, and multi-step delivery scenarios where agents must validate assumptions and avoid unverified completion outcomes.