lint_wiki

Audit inspool-wiki-en/wiki for structural gaps and metadata inconsistencies.

118|26|Updated Apr 11, 2026

Search Tags:#audit #metadata #structure #evidence #wiki #relationships #lint

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/songzhuozhu/obsidian-llm-wiki --skill lint-wiki-songzhuozhu

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: lint_wiki
Source: https://github.com/songzhuozhu/obsidian-llm-wiki/tree/main/.codex-en/skills/lint_wiki
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/songzhuozhu/obsidian-llm-wiki --skill lint-wiki-songzhuozhu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill performs a structural and content-health audit of inspool-wiki-en/wiki, identifying gaps in structure, evidence chains, relationships, and raw-state consistency, and guides safe fixes for low-risk issues.

Core Features & Use Cases

Automated structural audit: detects orphan pages, missing cross-links, and inconsistent naming.
Evidence and relationships validation: checks for missing supports, contradicts, or related_* fields, and ensures links reflect the frontmatter and body.
Raw-state hygiene: flags stale raw/unprocessed entries and mismatches between raw/index.md and actual directories.
Use Case: A wiki maintainer runs lint_wiki to produce a prioritized report and apply safe fixes to strengthen overall knowledge integrity.

Quick Start

Run a structural audit on inspool-wiki-en/wiki and apply safe fixes for detected issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about lint_wiki

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I audit wiki structure for orphan pages and unsupported claims?▼

You can audit wiki structure by automatically detecting orphan pages, missing cross-links, and inconsistent naming. This structural audit identifies gaps and guides safe fixes to strengthen overall knowledge integrity.

How do I validate metadata hygiene and link integrity in a wiki?▼

You validate metadata hygiene by checking raw and state consistency, verifying link integrity, and validating core page fields before saving updates. This process detects stale raw references and mismatches between raw index files and actual directories.

What is the best way to fix evidential gaps in a wiki knowledge base?▼

The best way to fix evidential gaps is to validate evidence chains and relationship fields. This involves checking for missing supports, contradicts, or related fields, ensuring that links accurately reflect both the frontmatter and body content.

Can I automatically apply safe fixes to detected wiki structural issues?▼

Yes, you can automatically apply safe fixes to detected wiki structural issues. The audit generates a prioritized report and guides low-risk fixes for issues like missing relationship fields and stale raw unprocessed entries.

Why does my wiki contain stale raw references and inconsistent states?▼

Stale raw references and inconsistent states occur when raw index files mismatch actual directories or when unprocessed entries are left behind. A raw-state hygiene check flags these stale entries and validates raw and state consistency.