lit-review

Orchestrate multi-session literature reviews with templates and dashboards.

1|1|Updated Apr 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/eabeam/econ-skills --skill lit-review-eabeam
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: lit-review
Source: https://github.com/eabeam/econ-skills/tree/main/lit-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/eabeam/econ-skills --skill lit-review-eabeam

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Literature reviews across projects are often fragmented, making it hard to maintain consistency, track progress, and share findings across collaborators.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Scaffold standardized, multi-session review templates and dashboards.
  • Support multiple output formats (Markdown, Quarto, Beamer) and referee passes.
  • Maintain a centralized MASTER_LIST and CONTINUATION_LOG to ensure reproducibility and continuity.

Quick Start

Run the setup to initialize a new lit-review workspace and configure base settings.

Frequently Asked Questions about lit-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a multi-session literature review to maintain consistency across projects?

You can structure a multi-session literature review by using standardized templates and dashboards to scaffold your workflow, ensuring consistency and making it easier to track progress and share findings across collaborators.

Can I generate literature review outputs in Quarto and Beamer formats?

Yes, you can generate literature review outputs in Markdown, Quarto, and Beamer formats, allowing you to seamlessly integrate your research findings into various documentation and presentation environments.

What is the best way to track research progress and ensure reproducibility in empirical projects?

The best way to track research progress and ensure reproducibility is by maintaining a centralized MASTER_LIST and CONTINUATION_LOG, which monitor progress and guarantee continuity across multiple review sessions.

How do I set up a literature review workspace for an empirical research project?

To set up a literature review workspace, you run an initial setup configuration to initialize the environment and establish base settings, requiring minimal configuration before scaffolding your standardized review templates.

Does this literature review workflow support quality checks and referee passes?

Yes, the literature review workflow supports referee passes, allowing you to conduct quality checks and validate your research outputs before finalizing the standardized review documentation.

Why are my fragmented literature reviews hard to manage across different collaborators?

Fragmented literature reviews are hard to manage because they lack standardized scaffolding and centralized dashboards, making it difficult to maintain consistency, track progress, and share findings across multiple collaborators.