lit-review

Map literature debates and synthesize findings across political science, international relations, and econometrics.

5|1|Updated Feb 10, 2026

Search Tags:#econometrics #literature-review #systematic-review #policy-research #political-science #international-relations

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/mgaldino/agents-workflow --skill lit-review-mgaldino

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: lit-review
Source: https://github.com/mgaldino/agents-workflow/tree/main/skills-docs/lit-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mgaldino/agents-workflow --skill lit-review-mgaldino

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Este Skill orienta pesquisadores sêniores na condução de uma revisão de literatura sistemática em Ciência Política, Relações Internacionais ou Econometria aplicada, simplificando a definição de escopo, o mapeamento da literatura, a síntese de argumentos e a identificação de gaps.

Core Features & Use Cases

Definição de escopo de pesquisa com perguntas de pesquisa, disciplinas relevantes, janela temporal e restrições geográficas.
Mapeamento da literatura em trabalhos seminais, debates centrais, métodos predominantes, evolução temporal e estado atual.
Síntese de cada obra com argumento central, estratégia empírica, achado e limitações; identificação de gaps teóricos, empíricos, metodológicos e de dados.
Sugerir perguntas de pesquisa futuras com base nos gaps identificados.

Quick Start

Conduza uma revisão sistemática da literatura definindo o escopo, mapeando a literatura, sintetizando trabalhos relevantes e identificando gaps.

Frequently Asked Questions about lit-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I conduct a systematic literature review in political science or econometrics?▼

A systematic literature review maps seminal works, central debates, and methodological evolution in political science or econometrics. This skill enforces a structured workflow for defining scope, synthesizing findings, and categorizing theoretical or empirical gaps.

What is the best way to map central debates and identify research gaps in international relations?▼

Mapping central debates and identifying research gaps in international relations requires synthesizing each work's core argument, empirical strategy, and limitations. This process categorizes gaps into theoretical, empirical, methodological, and data dimensions to suggest future research questions.

Can I use this systematic review approach for applied econometrics and policy research?▼

Yes, this systematic review approach supports applied econometrics and policy research by defining research scope, temporal windows, and geographical constraints. It synthesizes relevant empirical strategies and findings to map the evolution of the field.

How do I define the scope for a literature review to ensure I cover relevant disciplinary boundaries?▼

Defining the scope for a literature review involves specifying research questions, relevant disciplines, temporal windows, and geographical constraints. This establishes clear boundaries to systematically map seminal works and synthesize findings without exceeding the research focus.

What limitations should I anticipate when synthesizing empirical strategies in a systematic literature review?▼

When synthesizing empirical strategies in a systematic literature review, anticipate limitations in data availability, methodological constraints, and theoretical boundaries. Identifying these gaps helps accurately suggest future research questions based on the current state of the field.