literature-grounding

Retrieve representative academic papers and citations for scientific claims.

13|1|Updated Nov 27, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/q734738781/CatMaster --skill literature-grounding
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: literature-grounding
Source: https://github.com/q734738781/CatMaster/tree/main/skills/literature-grounding
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/q734738781/CatMaster --skill literature-grounding

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps decide when literature-level grounding is necessary and produces compact, curated literature packs that provide representative papers, citations, and confidence for scientific claims and benchmarking conventions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Decide when to trigger literature work: Distinguishes between lightweight web searches and paper-level grounding to avoid unnecessary deep reviews.
  • Depth-guided retrieval: Recommends quick, standard, focused, or deep_report depths depending on request scope (representative papers, method conventions, focused evidence, or survey-style reviews).
  • Source routing and packaging: Prefers web-first retrieval with escalation to scholarly metadata (OpenAlex/Semantic Scholar) when paper metadata or citation fidelity is required, and returns a concise literature pack for planners or writers.

Quick Start

Use the literature-grounding skill to locate representative papers, assemble a short summary and citation pack, and indicate confidence and follow-up questions.

Frequently Asked Questions about literature-grounding

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I find representative academic papers to ground scientific claims in a literature review?

Trigger literature grounding when you need to verify benchmarking conventions or assemble citation packs. It distinguishes between lightweight web searches and paper-level grounding to avoid unnecessary deep reviews, returning curated evidence packages.

How do I generate a citation pack with confidence scores for catalysis research workflows?

Retrieve scholarly metadata by escalating from web-first searches to OpenAlex and Semantic Scholar when citation fidelity is required. This source routing ensures accurate metadata extraction for your literature pack.

What is the best way to assemble a related-work summary from scholarly search results?

Choose a retrieval depth by matching your request scope: quick for representative papers, standard for method conventions, focused for specific evidence, or deep_report for survey-style literature reviews. This depth-guided approach optimizes the evidence gathering process.

When should I escalate from a standard web search to scholarly metadata sources for evidence grounding?

Escalate to scholarly metadata sources when paper metadata or citation fidelity is required for evidence grounding. The skill prefers web-first retrieval and only routes to OpenAlex or Semantic Scholar when higher accuracy is necessary.