What problem does it solve? Writing a literature review often leads to fabricated citations, per-paper listing without synthesis, or unverifiable Chinese sources. This Skill enforces a source-first workflow that only writes review paragraphs from verified references, preventing fake citations and empty template prose. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Source Verification Gating: Chinese references must go through browser-task/CNKI verification or manual user backfill; English references use scholar_search metadata plus DOI, publisher, or arXiv pages for stronger evidence. - Evidence-Claim Mapping: Builds a Source ID to claim mapping table before writing, so every literature judgment in the text traces back to a verifiable source with explicit in-text citations (GB/T 7714 by default). - Thematic Synthesis Writing: Organizes reviews by method families, problem conditions, and research gaps instead of author-by-author listing, with quantity targets for technical papers (e.g., 20 English + 10 Chinese sources). - Use Case: A graduate student writing the related work section of a thesis on surface defect detection uses this Skill to verify CNKI and scholar_search sources, build the evidence map, and produce a synthesized review with proper citations. ## Quick Start Help me write the literature review section for my paper on steel surface defect detection, verifying Chinese sources via CNKI and English sources via scholar_search first.
