literature-review

Conduct systematic literature reviews across academic databases with PRISMA diagrams.

203|27|Updated Apr 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill literature-review-franklee16
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: literature-review
Source: https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/main/literature-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill literature-review-franklee16

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires requests, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you conduct rigorous, end-to-end literature reviews that span multiple databases while ensuring the final bibliography and citations are accurate and consistently formatted.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic multi-database search & aggregation: Plan scope and eligibility, run searches across biomedical/scientific sources, export results, and deduplicate records before screening.
  • Screening, extraction, and quality assessment: Title/abstract/full-text screening with documented exclusion reasons, plus study-quality grading using appropriate tools (e.g., Cochrane/AMSTAR/Newcastle–Ottawa).
  • Verified citations and professional deliverables: Verify DOIs, format references in styles like APA/Nature/Vancouver/Vancouver-equivalents, and generate publication-ready markdown and PDF outputs.
  • Mandatory visual schematics for completeness: Requires at least one PRISMA- or strategy-type figure generated via scientific-schematics before finalizing.

Quick Start

Use the literature-review skill to draft a systematic review outline and produce a markdown + PDF draft with verified DOIs and a PRISMA diagram.

Frequently Asked Questions about literature-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a systematic literature review across multiple academic databases?

A systematic literature review searches across biomedical and scientific databases, aggregates results, and deduplicates records before screening. You plan the scope and eligibility criteria, then extract findings with documented exclusion reasons and quality assessment.

How does PRISMA flow diagram generation work for meta-analysis screening?

PRISMA flow diagram generation maps the screening process by tracking records through identification, deduplication, title/abstract screening, and full-text exclusion. This Skill requires generating at least one PRISMA or strategy-type schematic via scientific-schematics before finalizing outputs.

Can I verify DOIs and format references in Vancouver or APA style for academic writing?

DOI verification and reference formatting support styles including APA, Nature, and Vancouver. The Skill checks citation DOIs for accuracy and applies consistent formatting across your bibliography to produce publication-ready markdown and PDF outputs.

What is the best way to assess study quality for a scoping review using Cochrane or Newcastle-Ottawa tools?

Study-quality grading for scoping reviews uses standardized tools like Cochrane, AMSTAR, or Newcastle-Ottawa scales. The Skill applies these instruments during the extraction phase to document methodological quality alongside screening outcomes.

Does citation verification via DOI checking work with markdown and PDF deliverables?

Citation verification via DOI checking works directly with markdown and PDF deliverables. The Skill validates DOIs against source databases and integrates the verified references into professionally formatted publication-ready outputs.

What are the limitations of automated literature search aggregation for systematic reviews?

Automated literature search aggregation requires clear eligibility criteria and manual full-text screening to ensure accuracy. While the Skill deduplicates records and formats references, researchers must still validate study relevance and quality assessment interpretations.