What problem does it solve? Conducting a rigorous literature review requires structured search strategies, explicit screening criteria, and defensible synthesis, which is difficult to do consistently without a defined process. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured Review Workflow: Guides the full process from framing a research question (PICO, PCC, SPIDER) through search planning, screening, extraction, quality appraisal, and synthesis. - Evidence Tables and PRISMA-Style Screening: Provides extraction matrices, inclusion/exclusion criteria templates, and search logs for traceable reviews. - Citation Discipline: Enforces source-grounded claims, distinguishes evidence strength, and prevents invented citations or overstated findings. - Use Case: A regulatory affairs specialist needs a scoping review of clinical evidence requirements for software as a medical device across FDA, EU MDR, and NMPA jurisdictions, with an evidence table and gap analysis. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to conduct a literature review on your research question with a search strategy, screening criteria, evidence table, and synthesis of key findings.
