literature-search

A systematic literature review using PRISMA guidelines requires designing search strings, selecting databases, applying inclusion criteria, and documenting screening steps. This workflow automates that process, providing structured synthesis and gap analysis for biomedical or computer science research.

The best way to structure search strategies for meta-analysis is defining a clear research question and reproducible search terms. This workflow encodes a repeatable process to assemble search strings, apply inclusion/exclusion criteria, and organize evidence for transparent reporting.

Yes, this systematic review workflow supports both biomedical and computer science domains. It aligns with PRISMA methodology to guide search strategy, screening, and data synthesis, making it suitable for researchers conducting background work or methods sections across these fields.

To automate screening and data synthesis in a systematic review, you need a structured workflow that defines criteria and documents each step. This approach guides you through assembling search terms and organizing evidence for clear reporting and gap analysis.

Yes, a PRISMA-based literature search requires frontmatter-defined metadata to guide the workflow. Providing this metadata helps the process define your research question, assemble search terms, select databases, and document screening steps for a reproducible end-to-end review.