ljg-qa

Extract a text's core argument into an interconnected Q-A chain in org-mode format.

6.8k|781|Updated Mar 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lijigang/ljg-skills --skill ljg-qa
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ljg-qa
Source: https://github.com/lijigang/ljg-skills/tree/main/skills/ljg-qa
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lijigang/ljg-skills --skill ljg-qa

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

读一本文章/论文/书籍时,将其论证骨架拆解为一条清晰的 Q-A 链,强调“为什么/怎么/边界”,以便复现作者推理而非简单摘要。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 将复杂论证转化为一个互相关联的 Q-A 路径,聚焦原因、过程、边界,而非表面结论。
  • 强制每个问答的四段结构:结论、形式化、怎么想到的、边界,以确保可抄走且可审计。
  • 遵循清晰工作流,支持对文章 URL、PDF 或文本进行核心观点提取,并输出 org-mode 格式的 Q-A。
  • 适用于研究、批判性阅读与教学场景,帮助读者复现原文推理路径。

Quick Start

将文章或文本输入,生成一个5-10条Q-A链,输出为org-mode格式。

Frequently Asked Questions about ljg-qa

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I extract core arguments from a research paper into an interconnected Q-A chain?

This Skill extracts the core argument by generating a 5-10 question sequence in org-mode format. It enforces a four-part answer structure covering conclusion, formalization, derivation, and boundaries to reproduce the author's reasoning.

What is the best way to formalize critical reading notes for argument analysis?

Formalizing critical reading notes is best achieved by enforcing a four-part answer structure: Conclusion, Formalization, How it was derived, and Boundaries. This structure ensures extracted arguments are auditable and reproducible rather than simple summaries.

How to generate org-mode formatted questions from article URLs or text for knowledge extraction?

You generate org-mode formatted questions by inputting article URLs, PDFs, or text into the workflow. The Skill then outputs a directional Q-A chain that enforces logical flow and relevance between the interconnected questions.

Does this argument analysis workflow work for both academic papers and full books?

Yes, this argument analysis workflow applies to articles, academic papers, and full books. It processes any input text to produce a 5-10 question sequence that reconstructs the original reasoning path for research or teaching.

What are the limitations of using automated question design for critical reading?

A limitation of automated question design is that the output is restricted to a 5-10 question sequence in org-mode format. It focuses strictly on reasoning boundaries and derivation rather than producing comprehensive surface-level summaries.